<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alice in Wonderland Reviewed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mondomagazine.net/2010/alice-in-wonderland-reviewed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mondomagazine.net/2010/alice-in-wonderland-reviewed/</link>
	<description>We're not geeks!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 15:21:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean Kelly</title>
		<link>http://mondomagazine.net/2010/alice-in-wonderland-reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-4263</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondomagazine.net/?p=9070#comment-4263</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...I just noticed that I made an unintentional pun when I said that Tweedledee and Tweedledum were &quot;rounding&quot; out the characters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;I just noticed that I made an unintentional pun when I said that Tweedledee and Tweedledum were &#8220;rounding&#8221; out the characters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Kelly</title>
		<link>http://mondomagazine.net/2010/alice-in-wonderland-reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-4262</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondomagazine.net/?p=9070#comment-4262</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it kind of confuses me why Burton didn&#039;t shoot in 3D, since it was the plan from the get-go to have the film that way.

My guess is that it is cheaper to do a 3D conversion rather than shoot the film with a stereoscopic camera.  I believe it will be this aspect that becomes 3D&#039;s greatest challenge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it kind of confuses me why Burton didn&#8217;t shoot in 3D, since it was the plan from the get-go to have the film that way.</p>
<p>My guess is that it is cheaper to do a 3D conversion rather than shoot the film with a stereoscopic camera.  I believe it will be this aspect that becomes 3D&#8217;s greatest challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caesar</title>
		<link>http://mondomagazine.net/2010/alice-in-wonderland-reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-4254</link>
		<dc:creator>Caesar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondomagazine.net/?p=9070#comment-4254</guid>
		<description>I really enjoyed this film.  I like the direction Burton took the movie, I liked the style of the movie, I liked the idea that Alice couldn&#039;t remember her previous trips to Wonderland.  It was really cool.

The 3D was sub par though.  A little gimmicky yes, but also kind of unnecessary...I wouldn&#039;t have any problem watching this in 2D.  AIW wasn&#039;t actually shot in 3D, they shot it in 2D and added the 3D in later, and I thought it showed.  

Clash of the Titans comes out April 2nd, and it was also shot in 2D but modified to 3D, so we&#039;ll see how that one turns out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed this film.  I like the direction Burton took the movie, I liked the style of the movie, I liked the idea that Alice couldn&#8217;t remember her previous trips to Wonderland.  It was really cool.</p>
<p>The 3D was sub par though.  A little gimmicky yes, but also kind of unnecessary&#8230;I wouldn&#8217;t have any problem watching this in 2D.  AIW wasn&#8217;t actually shot in 3D, they shot it in 2D and added the 3D in later, and I thought it showed.  </p>
<p>Clash of the Titans comes out April 2nd, and it was also shot in 2D but modified to 3D, so we&#8217;ll see how that one turns out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

